[dq-rules] Re: Nominations

["John Rauchert" <john.rauchert@sait.ab.ca>]

"john corey" <joh-@westpole.com> wrote: 
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/dq-rules/?start=11
> I do not know if there has been any decisions made on who will
> constitute the group that over sees this open source project.

I submit that the participants in this project are more important than
the oversight group.  They are the ones that will do the interesting
stuff.  The oversight group gets the job of coordinating efforts,
making sure that work done conforms to the DQ development guidelines
and reporting back to the DQ community at large about our efforts. What
we need this group to do first is formulate the ground rules that we
will be working from (taking from other projects of this sort).

> JohnR - As the leader of the DQPA he is an obvious choice.  I like
> Rodgers idea of having him oversee and be the tie-breaker.

I am willing to help with the oversight group and whenever possible
with rules development (I even have a few rules variants of my own).


> Rodger Thorm - I hope I am spelling your name right! He started this
> effort, and I have gotten a lot of quality DQ advice from him.

I think that it is appropriate that we stick Rodger with this job as he
stuck me with the being the DQPA rep (although many of the development
teams will be DQPA members)on this one.

> Snafaru (Eric) - His website is excellent, and I often refer people to
> his rules clarifications.

We would have to invite Eric into the group as he is not currently on
the DQ-rules List.

I cannot speak for anyone else.