[dq-rules] Re: Rules clarifications

["John M. Kahane" <jkahane@comnet.ca>]

     Hullo, JohnC,

     Gee, have you noticed the proliferations of Johns around here?
<g>

>On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 20:50:11 -0800, john Corey wrote:

>JohnR pointed out that rules (like the completed electronic version of DQ second edition that is floating around) could not be republished.
>That sounds reasonable but we should be able to publish rules clarifications, should we not?  

      Yes, we should.   I don't see Hasbro having any real problems
with that, since they should still be sticking with the original
policy that was established on this matter.

>Here is what I have in mind:
>First, we wstate that we are working from the second edition.  

      Agreed.   The 2nd Edition of DQ is most likely the definitive
one, other than the material in Arcane Wisdom.

>Then we should be free to collect opinion's on rules that need clarification (I am sure each of us could think of a few off of the tops of our >heads ->).  

       No argument here. :)

>Then we can publish rules clarifications in an organized manner, using the numbering scheme in the book.  

      Rather than publish the rules clarifications right off the bat,
we need to agree on the rule clarification of a given subject or
topic first.  Publish after we have a final version we can all live
with.


... Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall take flack from both sides.

       JohnK
       jkahane@comnet.ca
       http://www.comnet.ca/~jkahane