[dq-rules] Re: Nominations

["John M. Kahane" <jkahane@comnet.ca>]

      Hullo, JohnC,

>On Fri, 11 Feb 2000 13:35:08 -0800, john Corey wrote:

>I would like to make the following recomendation. I think the following
>people should be members of the group:

       Okay, I'm all ears... :)

>JohnR - As the leader of the DQPA he is an obvious choice.  I like
>Rodgers idea of having him oversee and be the tie-breaker.

       No argument here.

>Rodger Thorm - I hope I am spelling your name right! He started this
>effort, and I have gotten a lot of quality DQ advice from him.

       Ditto. :)

>JohnK - He playtested the original game, what elese is there to say?

        Geez, John....do you know how *long* ago that was? :)    I
still have the material on the original game that we playtested, but
it's buried in some deep vault of a box in a storage room I have at
the house.    I suspect there are a few others out there who worked
with the game who are more qualified than I am, but.... Still, I'm
flattered. :)

>Snafaru (Eric) - His website is excellent, and I often refer people to
>his rules clarifications.

        Yep.

>ME, JohnC (Juanc1) - Though I have not played as much as you guys, I
>did originaly begin playing in 1981-82 when I bought the original hard
>cover. I am recently returned to the game and hope I can offer a fresh
>perspective. 

        I think the fresh perspective element is an important one to
consider, as long as we don't get away from what the game was all
about..  But you are a good choice in this. :)

Also, I have a lot of technical know-how and muscle (my
>boss has already offered to let us use our companies version management
>tools) and a lot of players to help my put stuff together.

       Always useful. :)

... One more drink, and I'll be under the host. (Dorothy Parker)

       JohnK
       jkahane@comnet.ca
       http://www.comnet.ca/~jkahane