Re: [dq-rules] New Numbering

[rthorm@cornellbox.com]

My objectives for this project are:
  1.  Open content and freely distributable version of the rules.
  2.  Clarification and revision of existing rules.
  3.  Incoprporate changes and new rules into the system.
  4.  Allow ongoing improvement and development of the game.

"Working on Troubadour skill" means I am doing a draft rewrite of the rule. 
I've already done a rewrite of 81 (Monetary Matters), and decided to take on a
skill next.  Rewriting the operational rules (how magic works, how combat
works, etc.) will probably be the hardest parts to rewrite/revise.

I would love to start compiling new submissions as well, though for the time
being my focus is on the rewrite of the existing rules.  The proposed
submission/approval process seems too formal for the way this community
operates, and it's probably unnecessary.  

This is my project, so at the moment, I'm wearing all the hats.  I'm the editor.
 I'm deciding what to include and what to exclude and what needs to be revised.
 I'm coming up with the numbering system.  And so forth.  

That's not to say that no one else's opinion counts.  I hope to keep things
moving along with a consensus, rather than alienating everyone.

  --Rodger


Quoting Stephen Johnson <stephenj@westpole.com>:

> What's the objective in re-writing the rules?
> Clarification
> Addition
> Ease of Reference
> All of the Above?
> 
> When you say you are "working on the Troubador skill" what exactly are 
> you doing with it?
> 
> For additions, are we using the submission/approval process that's 
> posted on the group?
> 
> And is there an "editor"?  Not someone with final say on what goes in, 
> just someone in charge of the "official" version.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.