[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [dq-rules] Gender Neutral Writing
Hey guys,
I'm a writer, and I just wanted to toss in my two cents. There
are few things as clear and obvious that point out a lousy
editor or a bad writer than mixing genders in text, when
referring to non-specific entities.
The English language uses He, Him, and His as gender-neutral
terms, and that's just the way it is. The people that complain
that it is sexist only serve to show their own lack of education,
and don't even have the sense to be embarrassed, and then there
are those that "feel their pain" and try to acquiesce, and by
doing so, are effectively doing the same thing in reverse, which
actually becomes sexist and derogatory. It's ludicrous. The male
word form is used for both specific individuals that are male, and
for general, non-specific references. The feminine is only used
for specific instances where a known female is the subject.
If you want your book to look like it was self-published, mixing
gender terms will do the trick, and you won't be taken seriously
by many. I, and many others I know, will avoid purchasing a book
when we spot this foolishness that creates bias where none existed
(all in the name of eliminating it, ironically), because it shows
a lack of professionalism, which weighs heavily on the impression
of the likely contents, as well as the simple fact that it's
incredibly annoying and detracts from the focus of the material.
Never be afraid to stand firm in defense of the English language,
especially when the illiterate attempt to mangle it further in the
name of political correctness, while simultaneously trying to make
you feel guilty for something you haven't done wrong. If you need
proof or encouragement in this area, you merely have to remember
that ebonics was actually taken seriously for a brief time in this
country before everyone came to their senses.
Best regards,
Larry mailto:Kurgan@Fastmail.fm