[dq-rules] Re: [ collecting what is out there]

[John Corey <juanc1@netscape.net>]

John K,

Your points about duplication are weel made.  I had hoped to eliminate some of
the duplicate material by going through it, rather than have it all submited
to the group. In other words, that was my goal :-)


"John M. Kahane" <jkahane@comnet.ca> wrote:
     Hullo, JohnC,

>On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:44:56 -0800, john Corey wrote:

>One option is to have every one post new rules and what not here, and
>certainly that shouls be done.  But another idea is to comb the web for
>existing house rules, and prepare a list of the m for posting here.  I
>will volunteer to do that and post a summary of my findings.  Let me
>know if ya'll think that is a good idea.

       This seems to be a good idea to me, although I suspect that
you may find duplicates of materials out there and all.    Not that
this is a bad thing, of course, but it's something to take into
account.

... Physics and mysticism are complementary aspects in a single reality.
(Wolfgang Pauli)

       JohnK
       jkahane@comnet.ca
       http://www.comnet.ca/~jkahane


------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Post a message, send it to:   dq-rules@eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: dq-rules-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shop for your Valentine at eGroups!
http://click.egroups.com/1/1157/0/_/386411/_/950237038/

-- Create a poll/survey for your group!
-- http://www.egroups.com/vote?listname=dq-rules&m=1



____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.