[dq-rules] Re: New Skills for DragonQuest

["john Corey" <john@westpole.com>]

> I have to disagree with the Knight skill being a
> useful addition.  A knight would simply be a person
> with horsemanship, many high weapon skills, including
> lance, possession of good armor, etc.  I don't see
> what value a separate knight skill would add.  It
> seems much more like a roleplaying issue.  

You are right.  Maybe a diplomat, or scholar are better examples of
voids in the DragonQuest systems
> 
> I see the hunting skill as something that should be
> part of the Ranger skill, since hunting requires
> knowledge of animals, terrain, tracking, etc.  
> 

So you see what I am saying, just don't agree with my examples